multidisciplinary counterintelligence vs counter espionage

Being aware that one's enemies may try to confuse is a relevant factor, especially in the areas of intelligence cycle security and its subdiscipline counterintelligence. The analyst must avoid the special cognitive traps for intelligence analysis projecting what she or he wants the opponent to think, and using available information to justify that conclusion. Analysts may use their own standard of proportionality as to the risk acceptance of the opponent, rejecting that the opponent may take an extreme risk to achieve what the analyst regards as a minor gain. Many analysts prefer the middle-of-the-road explanation, rejecting high or low probability explanations. Intelligence analysis is a way of reducing the ambiguity of highly ambiguous situations. Overview Analysis is part of the Intelligence Process or Cycle Although its practice is found in its purest form inside national intelligence agencies, its methods are also applicable in fields such as business intelligence or competitive intelligence. The descriptions are drawn from what may only be available in the form of deliberately deceptive information the analyst must correlate the similarities among deceptions and extract a common truth. Intelligence analysis is the application of individual and collective cognitive methods to weigh data and test hypotheses within a secret socio-cultural context.

( December 2017) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message) Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic.

Multidisciplinary counterintelligence vs counter espionage